[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140603183057.GA31382@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 20:30:57 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uprobes/x86: Rename arch_uprobe->def into ->dflt,
minor comment updates
On 06/03, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h
> > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct arch_uprobe {
> > struct {
> > u8 fixups;
> > u8 ilen;
> > - } def;
> > + } dflt;
>
> Pls lts nt use slly abbrvtns, ok?
OK. As I said in the previous dicussion, I agree with any naming.
> How about arch_uprobe->default?
And this is how it was named when I wrote this code. Unfortunately gcc
dislikes this name ;) So I renamed it to ->def. Then I was asked to
rename it and I agree, ->def doesn't look good.
Could you suggest something better?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists