[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140603190056.GD6013@esperanza>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 23:00:59 +0400
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>
CC: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <hannes@...xchg.org>,
<mhocko@...e.cz>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 5/8] slab: remove kmem_cache_shrink retval
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 09:48:51AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>
> > Still, I really want to evict all empty slabs from cache on memcg
> > offline for sure. Handling failures there means introducing a worker
> > that will retry shrinking, but that seems to me as an unnecessary
> > complication, because there's nothing that can prevent us from shrinking
> > empty slabs from the cache, even if we merge slab defragmentation, isn't
> > it?
> >
> > May be, it's worth introducing a special function, say kmem_cache_zap(),
> > that will only evict empty slabs from the cache, plus disable empty
> > slabs caching? This function would be called only from memcg offline for
> > dead memcg caches.
>
> I am fine with the lower impact version that you came up with later.
Oh, I missed a couple of your previous e-mails, because our mail server
marked them (along with a hundred or so another messages :-) ) as junk
for some reason. Going to turn off the filter completely.
Sorry for being inconsistent and thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists