lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140603174631.2de89352@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Tue, 3 Jun 2014 17:46:31 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, josh@...htriplett.org,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
	dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com,
	fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers tag

On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 16:52:53 -0400
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:


> The important thing to note here is that we do not have consensus
> across all subsystems what Reviewed-by: means, and I think that's OK.
> The Reviewed-by: is mostly of interest to the maintainer before the
> patch is submitted to mainline.  The value of keeping it in the git
> commit logs after the fact seems to be a bit variable, although if
> there are companies blindly using it as a performance metric and this
> is driving down the quality of reviews, perhaps one could even argue
> that including these tags in the git commit logs is actually adding
> negative value.  But I don't really care about that issue, because
> like most maintainers, I know the reviewers by reputation, and whether
> someone actually says "you can add my Reviewed-by" is actually not so
> important as their comments on the patch, one way or another.

I prefer the Reviewed-by tags in the git commit. If something is
screwed up in a commit, I can blame the reviewers just as much as I can
blame the author :-)


-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ