[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1401835748.22133.13.camel@joe-AO725>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 15:49:08 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com, sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RFC 1/3] MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers
tag
On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 14:48 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 01:16:07PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 13:12 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 12:03:07PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 08:35 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > Paul Walmsley also noted the need for patch
> > > > > submitters to know who the key reviewers are and suggested adding an
> > > > > "R:" tag to the MAINTAINERS file to record this information on a
> > > > > per-subsystem basis.
> > > > []
> > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > > > []
> > > > > @@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ Descriptions of section entries:
> > > > >
> > > > > P: Person (obsolete)
> > > > > M: Mail patches to: FullName <address@...ain>
> > > > > + R: Designated reviewer, who should be CCed on patches,
> > > > > + format: FullName <address@...ain>
> > > > > L: Mailing list that is relevant to this area
> > > > > W: Web-page with status/info
> > > > > Q: Patchwork web based patch tracking system site
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps the M: and R: roles should be more fully
> > > > described here.
> > > >
> > > > The R: entry description doesn't need commas.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe something like:
> > > > M: Maintainer (to:) FullName <address@...ain>
> > > > R: Reviewer (cc:) FullName <address@...ain>
> > >
> > > This is arguably better organized, but I need to keep my focus on adding
> > > the designated reviewer. I am not in a position to undertake a rewrite
> > > of the MAINTAINER file preamble at this point.
> >
> > That's silly, you're adding the "R" entry.
> > Add a proper description for it.
>
> I will take another look at R: in a few days and possibly wordsmith it.
Swell, thanks.
> My reluctance is due to the fact that this will change how newbies
> submit patches.
Very, very doubtful that will change.
> But if we get a few Acked-by or Reviewed-by responses
> from high-level maintainers (Linus, Greg, Ingo, Thomas, Peter, Ted,
> Dave, Ben, ...), I will of course be happy to queue it.
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists