linux-kernel - [Question] Why CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140609140411.95B6.AA925319@jp.panasonic.com>
Date:	Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:04:12 +0900
From:	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@...panasonic.com>
To:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Question] Why CONFIG_SHELL

Hi experts.

I think all the macros with CONFIG_ prefix are supposed to be
defined in Kconfig.
But I've been long wondering why there exists one exception:
CONFIG_SHELL.

Is there any historical, or special reason?

Is it good to rename it to KBUILD_SHELL or something else?

Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/