[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpo=OSQ0MQuRUPYe39u19_+jGFYH0mqziPvMKx1GcTHB92g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 10:35:39 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: governor: Be friendly towards
latency-sensitive bursty workloads
On 8 June 2014 02:11, Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> + if (unlikely(wall_time > (2 * sampling_rate)) &&
> + j_cdbs->copy_prev_load) {
> + load = j_cdbs->prev_load;
> + j_cdbs->copy_prev_load = false;
> + } else {
> + load = 100 * (wall_time - idle_time) / wall_time;
> + j_cdbs->prev_load = load;
> + j_cdbs->copy_prev_load = true;
> + }
Hmm, slight modifications over the weekend :) ..
What do you think about removing this extra variable and using prev_load
only, i.e. make it zero in the else part? Also adding a comment for this would
be helpful ?
I will try a patch before you come to office :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists