[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140609223057.GB18475@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 15:30:57 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-audit@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] auditsc: audit_krule mask accesses need bounds
checking
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:09:58PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
>
> Fixes an easy DoS and possible information disclosure.
>
> This does nothing about the broken state of x32 auditing.
>
> eparis: If the admin has enabled auditd and has specifically loaded audit
> rules. This bug has been around since before git. Wow...
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
> ---
> kernel/auditsc.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Did this patch get dropped somewhere? Isn't it a valid bugfix, or did I
miss a later conversation about this?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists