linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] auditsc: audit_krule mask accesses need bounds checking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 9 Jun 2014 15:30:57 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-audit@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] auditsc: audit_krule mask accesses need bounds
 checking

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:09:58PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
> 
> Fixes an easy DoS and possible information disclosure.
> 
> This does nothing about the broken state of x32 auditing.
> 
> eparis: If the admin has enabled auditd and has specifically loaded audit
> rules.  This bug has been around since before git.  Wow...
> 
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/auditsc.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Did this patch get dropped somewhere?  Isn't it a valid bugfix, or did I
miss a later conversation about this?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/