[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwmajRnDOiBmZQf8rpVE-HigsDYy9oy-TsWLzn-vdyF+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 15:53:51 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, linux-audit@...hat.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] auditsc: audit_krule mask accesses need bounds checking
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>
> Hmm. It seems that it didn't make it into Linus' tree. Crap.
I assume that if there is a maintainer who normally sends me stuff by
git, when I see patches in emails they are just informational
heads-ups about stuff that is being discussed or pending, and that
I'll see it later in a pull request. So I just ignore them unless I
have specific comments, since clearly the emailed patch is just
informational and/or for comments/acks from others.
The exception is unless it *VERY CLEARLY* says otherwise (as in
"Linus, can you please take this directly due to xyz").
Because why would somebody send me a patch series sometimes, and git
trees at other times? That would just be stupid.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists