[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140610085157.GX6758@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:51:57 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>
Cc: paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhouyi Zhou <yizhouzhou@....ac.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf/amd: NULL return of kzalloc_node should be
handled
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 04:45:46PM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> Thanks Peter for reviewing, and sorry for not think it thoroughly
> before submitting.
> Is that ok that when amd_uncore_cpu_up_prepare is called from
> amd_uncore_cpu_notifier
> I return notifier_from_errno(-ENOMEM), and when
> amd_uncore_cpu_up_prepare is called from
> amd_uncore_init I immediately return -ENODEV?
That sounds about right. Thanks!
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists