lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:51:57 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>
Cc:	paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Zhouyi Zhou <yizhouzhou@....ac.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf/amd: NULL return of kzalloc_node should be
 handled

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 04:45:46PM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> Thanks Peter for reviewing, and sorry for not think it thoroughly
> before submitting.
> Is that ok that when amd_uncore_cpu_up_prepare is called from
> amd_uncore_cpu_notifier
> I return notifier_from_errno(-ENOMEM), and  when
> amd_uncore_cpu_up_prepare is called from
> amd_uncore_init I immediately return  -ENODEV?

That sounds about right. Thanks!

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ