| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CALCETrUvN1kYB=Z+wmPfbJawWSHb-r5NhmYLV1ZTxOWmHkanHw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:33:37 -0700 From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 03/10] tools: Add le_direct/be_direct methods for unaligned access On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:30 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote: > On 06/10/2014 04:25 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:13 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote: >>> For architectures which handle unaligned references transparently. >> >> Shouldn't these depend on host endianness? >> > > See further down the series for how these end up being invoked. > Ah, sneaky. Would it make sense to put a comment in this file (and similar files) indicating that they must only be included on architectures of the appropriate endianness? --Andy > -hpa > > -- Andy Lutomirski AMA Capital Management, LLC -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists