[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1406110129270.5170@nanos>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 01:34:39 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] irqchip: gic: always mask interrupts during suspend
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Brian Norris wrote:
> Other random thought: it seems like any irqchip driver which does lazy IRQ
> masking ought to use IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND. So maybe the IRQ core should just
> do something like:
>
> if (!chip->irq_disable)
> chip->flags |= IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND;
No. Lazy irq disable and the suspend logic are different beasts.
That's up to the platform to decide this. Just for the record: there
is a world outside of ARM...
But that brings me to a different question:
Why are you not putting that customization into the device tree
instead of trying to add this to some random arch/arm/mach-foo
files?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists