[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <3732251402489254@web2m.yandex.ru>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:20:54 +0400
From: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Tkhai Kirill <ktkhai@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: Rework migrate_tasks()
11.06.2014, 15:24, "Srikar Dronamraju" <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>:
> * Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com> [2014-06-11 13:52:10]:
>> Currently migrate_tasks() skips throttled tasks,
>> because they are not pickable by pick_next_task().
>
> Before migrate_tasks() is called, we do call set_rq_offline(), in
> migration_call().
>
> Shouldnt this take care of unthrottling the tasks and making sure that
> they can be picked by pick_next_task().
If we do this separate for every class, we'll have to do this 3 times.
Furthermore, deadline class does not have a list of throttled tasks.
So we'll have to the same as I did: to lock tasklist_lock and to iterate
throw all of the tasks in the system just to found deadline tasks.
>> These tasks stay on dead cpu even after they
>> becomes unthrottled. They are not schedulable
>> till user manually changes their affinity or till
>> cpu becomes alive again.
>
> If we are still seeing tasks not being picked by pick_next_task(), then
> can it probably mean that rq->rd was NULL?
Unthrottle functions dl_task_timer() and unthrottle_cfs_rq() put tasks and
queues back. They do not look at rq->rd.
do_sched_rt_period_timer() does not unthrottle dead queue at all (they
are excluded from rd).
Thanks,
Kirill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists