| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1402496254.2523.3.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 07:17:34 -0700 From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 05:01 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > After this first pull for the 3.16 merge window it seems like this > worked out fairly well - we got a large number of patches in, and all > reviewed by a second pair of eyes. > > How should we go on from this? The drivers-for-3.16-2 branch, which had > the late lpfs and hpsa updates didn't make it into the pull request for > Linus, do you intend to skip them for this window? If not do you still > want to have another branch for the other pending smaller updates? No, I was waiting to check if there was any reason to have them split, but I think we've scope today or tomorrow. The only other outstanding thing is the fsync bug fix, which is waiting Jens' investigation of the block issues it may cause, but I'm inclined to send it anyway and fix up block later if there's a problem. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists