linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140611143128.GA30904@infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jun 2014 07:31:28 -0700
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 07:17:34AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> No, I was waiting to check if there was any reason to have them split,
> but I think we've scope today or tomorrow.
> 
> The only other outstanding thing is the fsync bug fix, which is waiting
> Jens' investigation of the block issues it may cause, but I'm inclined
> to send it anyway and fix up block later if there's a problem.

There's various fixes marked for stable from Paolos virtio_scsi update,
which he asked to be considered for 3.16, including a core one:

  [PATCH v3 4/6] scsi_error: fix invalid setting of host byte

also

  [PATCH] sd: bad return code of init_sd

seems like another candidate for 3.16.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/