linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block: virtio_blk: don't hold spin lock during world switch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:44:31 +0200
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: virtio_blk: don't hold spin lock during world
 switch

Il 02/06/2014 15:06, Ming Lei ha scritto:
>> >
>> > If you're running SMP under an emulator where exits are expensive, then
>> > this wins.  Under KVM it's marginal at best.
> Both my tests on arm64 and x86 are under KVM, and looks the
> patch can improve performance a lot. IMO, even though under
> KVM, virtio-blk performance still depends how well hypervisor(
> qemu, ...) emulates the device, and basically speaking, it is
> expensive to switch from guest to host and let host handle the
> notification.

The difference is that virtio-pci supports ioeventfd and virtio-mmio 
doesn't.

With ioeventfd you can tell KVM "I don't care about the value that is 
written to a memory location, only that it is accessed".  Then when the 
write happens, KVM doesn't do an expensive userspace exit; it just 
writes 1 to an eventfd.

It then returns to the guest, userspace picks up the eventfd via its 
poll() loop and services the device.

This is already useful for throughput on UP, and the small latency cost 
(because of the cost of the event loop in the I/O thread, and possibly 
the cost of waking up the thread) is usually offset by the benefit.

But on SMP you get double benefit.  Obviously, the kernel doesn't have 
to spin while userspace does its stuff.  On top of this, there is also a 
latency improvement from ioeventfd, because QEMU processes 
virtqueue_notify under its "big QEMU lock".  With ioeventfd, serialized 
virtqueue processing can be a bottleneck, but it doesn't affect latency. 
  Without ioeventfd it affects the VCPUs' latency and negates a lot of 
the benefit of Ming Lei's patch.

You can try disabling ioeventfd with "-global 
virtio-blk-pci.ioeventfd=off" on the QEMU command line.  Performance 
will plummet. :)

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/