linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] KEYS: validate key trust with owner and builtin keys only

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Jun 2014 04:23:55 +0100
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@...sung.com>,
	keyrings <keyrings@...ux-nfs.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KEYS: validate key trust with owner and builtin keys
 only

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:08:15PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 03:22 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: 
> > Providing a userspace mechanism for selectively dropping keys from the 
> > kernel seems like a good thing?
> 
> No, patch "KEYS: verify a certificate is signed by a 'trusted' key" adds
> signed public keys.

Yes. Wouldn't having a mechanism to allow userspace to drop keys that 
have otherwise been imported be a generally useful solution to the issue 
you have with that?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/