lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbiob-2d4sTmj8bZxo5GVZ0TvF5CT_W94BDsSNiEfB7kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jun 2014 09:25:07 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Sascha Silbe <x-linux@...ra-silbe.de>
Cc:	Johan Hovold <jhovold@...il.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: ftdi_sio: add GPIO support

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Sascha Silbe <x-linux@...ra-silbe.de> wrote:

> The chips can operate either in regular or in bitbang mode. Care was
> taken to prevent using GPIOs if the serial device is in use and vice
> versa.

Very interesting patch! I've seen USB-based GPIO things before
but never a dual-mode thing.

There was already a comment to move the implementation to a
separate file, which I won't repeat.

But I also want to bring the device model into question: normally
when a mother device spawns children across different subsystems
we model them as MFD devices (drivers/mfd) that instantiate
children for the different subsystems. So you could spawn a
serial and a GPIO device from a USB-based hub device there.

I do not know if that is really apropriate in this case. It seems the
device is first and foremost FTDI.

But it could still spawn a child platform device for the GPIO stuff
so that this can live as a separate driver under drivers/gpio/gpio-ftdi.c
or similar.

You could then use something like:

struct platform_device *gdev;

gdev = platform_device_alloc("gpio-ftdi", PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO);
/* pdata contains communication cookie for callbacks etc */
ret = platform_device_add_data(gdev, pdata, sizeof(*pdata));
ret = platform_device_add(gdev);

Then we can probe that device normally in the GPIO subsystem
like any other driver, just that it needs some
<linux/usb/ftdi.h> header or similar to define the function
calls to communicate with the FTDI driver.

However Greg is device core maintainer and may have better
ideas about this!

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ