linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Tux3 for review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:32:16 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:	Daniel Phillips <daniel@...nq.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, tux3@...3.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Tux3 for review

Hi!

> > As I said, the glaring omission is proper ENOSPC handling, which is
> > work in progress. I do not view that as an obstacle to merging.
> >
> > After all, Btrfs did not have proper ENOSPC handling when it was
> > merged.
> 
> Yup, and that was a big mistake. Hence not having working ENOSPC
> detection is a major strike against merging a new filesystem now.

Hmm, it seems that merging filesystems is getting harder over
time. Soon, it will be impossible to merge new filesystem.

> > The design is here:
> 
> So come back when you've implemented it properly and proven that you
> have a sound design and clean implementation.

People submit code early to get feedback... but this is not exactly
helpful feedback, I'm afraid...

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/