linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] mmc: sdhci: Use mmc core regulator infrastucture

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:39:50 +0200
From:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:	Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@...aro.org>
Cc:	Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>, Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@...il.com>,
	Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>,
	Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
	Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] mmc: sdhci: Use mmc core regulator infrastucture

On 12 June 2014 20:48, Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@...aro.org> wrote:
> This series switches the common SDHCI code over to use mmc_host's
> regulator pointers rather than keeping its own set.
>
> In addition, we can now re-use the newly introduced local "mmc" pointer
> in several other function calls in lieu of using host->mmc.
>
> The first patch in the series has been posted before
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/24/947). The two follow-on patches have
> not. Patches 2 & 3 could be squashed together if the maintainers were
> so inclined.

Yes, please squash them. Otherwise this looks great!

Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/