[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140614130925.GA14744@fofx>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:09:25 -0400
From: Jeff Oczek <jeffoczek@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: tidspbridge: Fix function pointer spacing
in struct definition
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 08:31:40PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 22:48 -0400, Jeff Oczek wrote:
> > - s32(*fread) (void *, size_t, size_t, void *);
> > - s32(*fseek) (void *, long, int);
> > - s32(*ftell) (void *);
> > - s32(*fclose) (void *);
> > - void *(*fopen) (const char *, const char *);
> > + s32 (*fread)(void *, size_t, size_t, void *);
> > + s32 (*fseek)(void *, long, int);
> > + s32 (*ftell)(void *);
> > + s32 (*fclose)(void *);
> > + void *(*fopen)(const char *, const char *);
>
> Better would be to describe the arguments with
> variable names and align all the return values
>
> void *(*fopen
>
> s32 (*fread)(void *arg1, size_t val1, size_t val2, void *ptr1);
> s32 (*fseek)(void *ptr1, long arg2, int arg3);
> s32 (*ftell)(void * ptr);
> s32 (*fclose)(void *ptr);
> void *(*fopen)(const char *ptr1, const char *ptr2);
>
> where arg, val, ptr are actually useful descriptors
>
Thanks Joe. I was just trying to stay in the scope of making a
really trivial coding style change for the sake of following the
submission process for the first time. But I'll resend based on
your suggestion.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists