linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 2/7] efi: Introduce EFI_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:52:33 +0100
From:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To:	Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
	<linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<x86@...nel.org>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
CC:	<mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, <jeremy@...p.org>, <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	<ian.campbell@...rix.com>, <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
	<stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
	<david.vrabel@...rix.com>, <jbeulich@...e.com>, <hpa@...or.com>,
	<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	<eshelton@...ox.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 2/7] efi: Introduce EFI_NO_DIRECT flag

On 13/06/14 18:00, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Introduce EFI_NO_DIRECT flag.

EFI_PARAVIRT would be a clearer name I think.

> +#define EFI_NO_DIRECT		6	/* Can we access EFI directly? */

#define EFI_PARAVIRT 6 /* Access is via a paravirt interface */

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/