[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1402924462.1647.26.camel@leonhard>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 22:14:22 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] perf tools: Fix segfault in cumulative.callchain
report
2014-06-15 (일), 18:34 +0200, Jiri Olsa:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 09:46:31PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Hi Jiri,
> >
> > 2014-06-15 (일), 10:35 +0200, Jiri Olsa:
> > > heya,
> > > not completely sure this is what we want to do, but have no
> > > streght to dive into annotation code ;-)
> >
> > Currently, cumulative entries do not accounts annotation info so
> > annotation only works for normal entries. I'm not sure we should
> > support it or not, but anyway it also needs some updates on the
> > annotation code IMHO.
> >
> > So I'm okay with disabling annotation on pure cumulative entries.
>
> is that an ack? ;-)
Yep,
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists