linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] staging: lustre: lclient: lcommon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6D484D74-443E-4667-9CB8-4F90EC53FB81@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Jun 2014 05:05:33 +0000
From:	"Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
To:	Anil Belur <askb23@...il.com>
CC:	"Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
	"<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"<hpdd-discuss@...ts.01.org>" <hpdd-discuss@...ts.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] staging: lustre: lclient: lcommon_cl.c fixing
 coding style issues


On Jun 16, 2014, at 12:28 AM, Anil Belur wrote:

> From: Anil Belur <askb23@...il.com>
> 
> fixed: WARNING: line over 80 characters and indent after the conditional
> statement
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anil Belur <askb23@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lclient/lcommon_cl.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lclient/lcommon_cl.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lclient/lcommon_cl.c
> index c180a20..8fed70c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lclient/lcommon_cl.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lclient/lcommon_cl.c
> @@ -825,6 +825,7 @@ int ccc_prep_size(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_object *obj,
> 	loff_t	  pos   = start + count - 1;
> 	loff_t kms;
> 	int result;
> +	unsigned long cur_index;

I wonder why move this particular declaration here?
The only user is still in that one conditional branch anyway.

> 
> 	/*
> 	 * Consistency guarantees: following possibilities exist for the
> @@ -864,11 +865,13 @@ int ccc_prep_size(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_object *obj,
> 				 * linux-2.6.18-128.1.1 miss to do that.
> 				 * --bug 17336 */
> 				loff_t size = cl_isize_read(inode);
> -				unsigned long cur_index = start >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> +
> +				cur_index = start >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> +				loff_t check = ((size - 1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT);

This used to produce a warning about mixing code and declarations in the past. 
Probably a bad idea to mix them anyway.

Thanks.

Bye,
    Oleg

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/