[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1583331.cjuWMhE6Gz@al>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 22:58:44 +0200
From: Peter Wu <peter@...ensteyn.nl>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: mhocko@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Writing watchdog_thresh triggers BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context
On Monday 16 June 2014 16:52:45 Don Zickus wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 04:12:44PM +0200, Peter Wu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Writing to /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_thresh causes the following BUG in
> > at least v3.13-rc2-625-g06151db, v3.15 and v3.16-rc1. Kernel config is
> > attached.
> >
> > It was originally found on bare metal, since then reproduced in QEMU in
> > init, and when directly executing it.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Peter
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> I assume the following patch will work?
Yes, the patch works (no more BUG). No idea whether it is
(in)correct though.
Regards,
Peter
> Michal, do you remember why we needed preempt here? I wouldn't think it
> mattered as we are not doing anything per-cpu specific.
>
> Cheers,
> Don
>
> diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
> index 516203e..30e4822 100644
> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> @@ -527,10 +527,8 @@ static void update_timers_all_cpus(void)
> int cpu;
>
> get_online_cpus();
> - preempt_disable();
> for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> update_timers(cpu);
> - preempt_enable();
> put_online_cpus();
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists