[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140617085943.GA19886@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:59:43 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Wu <peter@...ensteyn.nl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Writing watchdog_thresh triggers BUG: sleeping function called
from invalid context
On Mon 16-06-14 16:52:45, Don Zickus wrote:
[...]
> Michal, do you remember why we needed preempt here? I wouldn't think it
> mattered as we are not doing anything per-cpu specific.
Yes, you are right. Preempt can be enabled because we are always
accessing watchdog_ev on a specific cpu so reschedule doesn't matter.
> Cheers,
> Don
>
> diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
> index 516203e..30e4822 100644
> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> @@ -527,10 +527,8 @@ static void update_timers_all_cpus(void)
> int cpu;
>
> get_online_cpus();
> - preempt_disable();
> for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> update_timers(cpu);
> - preempt_enable();
> put_online_cpus();
> }
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists