linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] mfd: axp20x: add AXP221 PMIC support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140618092806.GI23945@lee--X1>
Date:	Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:28:06 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
	Shuge <shuge@...winnertech.com>, kevin@...winnertech.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	dev@...ux-sunxi.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] mfd: axp20x: add AXP221 PMIC support

On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> On 18/06/2014 10:36, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Jun 2014, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> >
> >> Add support for the AXP221 PMIC device to the existing AXP20x driver.
> >>
> >> The AXP221 defines a new set of registers, power supplies and regulators,
> >> but most of the API is similar to the AXP20x ones.
> >> The AXP20x irq chip definition is reused, though some interrupts are not
> >> available in the AXP221.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/mfd/axp20x.c       | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >>  include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  2 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > Looks good to me now.
> >   Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> >
> > Can this go in independently to the other patches in the set?
> 
> Yes, as long as no one define an axp221 node in his DT.
> In this case axp221 regulators would be considered as axp20x ones (which
> might be a bit problematic), because axp20x-regulator driver does not
> test the axp variant before probing its regulators (this test is
> introduced in patch 3).

Then I'd prefer to wait and have the dependencies go in at the same
time.

Mark,
  As normal, I'm happy to create a shared branch between us.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/