[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140618095739.GA24419@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 11:57:39 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/10] x86, mpx: add macro cpu_has_mpx
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 05:44:09PM +0800, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
> In order to do performance optimization, this patch adds macro
> cpu_has_mpx which will directly return 0 when MPX is not supported
> by kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 6 ++++++
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index e265ff9..f302d08 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -339,6 +339,12 @@ extern const char * const x86_power_flags[32];
> #define cpu_has_eager_fpu boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EAGER_FPU)
> #define cpu_has_topoext boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MPX
> +#define cpu_has_mpx boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MPX)
I think we don't want those macros anymore because they're obfuscating
the code. You should use static_cpu_has instead.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists