linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] efi: Introduce EFI_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140618150815.GB28489@olila.local.net-space.pl>
Date:	Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:08:15 +0200
From:	Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>
To:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
	andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, david.vrabel@...rix.com,
	ian.campbell@...rix.com, jeremy@...p.org, matt.fleming@...el.com,
	x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
	boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
	eshelton@...ox.com, mingo@...hat.com, mjg59@...f.ucam.org,
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] efi: Introduce EFI_NO_DIRECT flag

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 03:30:25PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 18.06.14 at 15:52, <matt@...sole-pimps.org> wrote:
> > > EFI_PARAVIRT will be usable by architectures other than x86, correct? If
> > > your intention is for it only ever to be used by x86, then it should
> > > probably be EFI_ARCH_2.
> >
> > I would expect ARM, once it gets UEFI support on the Xen side, to
> > be able to handle most of this identically to x86. Which raises the
> > question whether most of the new Xen-specific code (in one of the
> > other patches) wouldn't better live under drivers/xen/.
>
> I was thinking the same thing.
>
> However this patch series doesn't add much code outside
> drivers/xen/efi.c and include/xen/interface/platform.h.
> I think it wouldn't be fair to ask Daniel to refactor the efi code
> currently under arch/x86 to an arch-independent location.
> Whoever comes in later and adds EFI Xen support for ARM can do that.

I was doing those EFI patches with ARM support in mind from the beginning.
That is why I moved everything, which was possible, to arch independent
place. There are only some simple init calls from arch/x86. Just a few
required lines. So I think that it will be quite easy to use this EFI
code on ARM platform.

Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/