lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:51:44 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 -next 0/9] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area
 management code

On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:25:07 +0900 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> wrote:

> > >v2:
> > >   - Although this patchset looks very different with v1, the end result,
> > >   that is, mm/cma.c is same with v1's one. So I carry Ack to patch 6-7.
> > >
> > >This patchset is based on linux-next 20140610.
> > 
> > Thanks for taking care of this. I will test it with my setup and if
> > everything goes well, I will take it to my -next tree. If any branch
> > is required for anyone to continue his works on top of those patches,
> > let me know, I will also prepare it.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm glad to hear that. :)
> But, there is one concern. As you already know, I am preparing further
> patches (Aggressively allocate the pages on CMA reserved memory). It
> may be highly related to MM branch and also slightly depends on this CMA
> changes. In this case, what is the best strategy to merge this
> patchset? IMHO, Anrew's tree is more appropriate branch. If there is
> no issue in this case, I am willing to develope further patches based
> on your tree.

That's probably easier.  Marek, I'll merge these into -mm (and hence
-next and git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git)
and shall hold them pending you review/ack/test/etc, OK?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists