lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 19 Jun 2014 17:18:07 +0900
From:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 -next 4/9] DMA, CMA: support arbitrary bitmap
 granularity

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 01:48:15PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 14:40:46 +0900 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> wrote:
> 
> > PPC KVM's CMA area management requires arbitrary bitmap granularity,
> > since they want to reserve very large memory and manage this region
> > with bitmap that one bit for several pages to reduce management overheads.
> > So support arbitrary bitmap granularity for following generalization.
> > 
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
> > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct cma {
> >  	unsigned long	base_pfn;
> >  	unsigned long	count;
> >  	unsigned long	*bitmap;
> > +	unsigned int order_per_bit; /* Order of pages represented by one bit */
> >  	struct mutex	lock;
> >  };
> >  
> > @@ -157,9 +158,37 @@ void __init dma_contiguous_reserve(phys_addr_t limit)
> >  
> >  static DEFINE_MUTEX(cma_mutex);
> >  
> > +static unsigned long cma_bitmap_aligned_mask(struct cma *cma, int align_order)
> > +{
> > +	return (1 << (align_order >> cma->order_per_bit)) - 1;
> > +}
> 
> Might want a "1UL << ..." here.

Okay!

> 
> > +static unsigned long cma_bitmap_maxno(struct cma *cma)
> > +{
> > +	return cma->count >> cma->order_per_bit;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static unsigned long cma_bitmap_pages_to_bits(struct cma *cma,
> > +						unsigned long pages)
> > +{
> > +	return ALIGN(pages, 1 << cma->order_per_bit) >> cma->order_per_bit;
> > +}
> 
> Ditto.  I'm not really sure what the compiler will do in these cases,
> but would prefer not to rely on it anyway!

Okay!

Thanks for fix!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists