lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1403196229.29394.10.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jun 2014 09:43:49 -0700
From:	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	jolsa@...nel.org, mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp, aswin@...com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Darren Hart <darren@...art.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] perf bench: futex: Support operations for shared
 futexes

On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 13:41 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:14:27AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso escreveu:
> > Unlike futex-hash, requeuing and wakeup benchmarks do not support
> > shared futexes, limiting the usefulness of the programs. Correct
> > this, and allow using the local -S parameter. The default remains
> > using private futexes.
> 
> Also isn't this benchmark related to something Darren did? Just checking
> why he isn't in the CC list, Darren, does this all sound fine to you?

Darren is well aware of these benchmarks, and we've discussed the topic
in the past. This change doesn't conflict with what he maintains in the
futextest suite.

Thanks,
Davidlohr

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ