lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:48:52 -0700
From:	Darren Hart <darren@...art.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>, jolsa@...nel.org,
	mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp, aswin@...com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] perf bench: futex: Support operations for shared
 futexes

On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 14:05 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:43:49AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso escreveu:
> > On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 13:41 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:14:27AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso escreveu:
> > > > Unlike futex-hash, requeuing and wakeup benchmarks do not support
> > > > shared futexes, limiting the usefulness of the programs. Correct
> > > > this, and allow using the local -S parameter. The default remains
> > > > using private futexes.
> > > 
> > > Also isn't this benchmark related to something Darren did? Just checking
> > > why he isn't in the CC list, Darren, does this all sound fine to you?
> > 
> > Darren is well aware of these benchmarks, and we've discussed the topic
> > in the past. This change doesn't conflict with what he maintains in the
> > futextest suite.
> 
> Ok, thanks, just checking :-)

Right. The plan, for the record, is to augment functional tests in
futextest and move all performance related tests to perf. Davidlohr's
tests are independent from those in futextest. I haven't done an
exhaustive comparison to see if there is overlap, but since he got to
perf first, we'll determine which futextest/performance tests add value
and add tose, and deep six the rest.

The functional tests may then be moved to linux/tools and futextest will
then be obsolete.

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists