[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140620081423.GQ5500@mwanda>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:14:23 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: josh@...htriplett.org
Cc: Johannes Stadlinger <Johannes.Stadlinger@....de>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Maximilian Eschenbacher <maximilian@...henbacher.email>,
linux-kernel@...cs.fau.de,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@...il.com>,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] wlan-ng/prism2mgmt:checkpatch: Insert blank line
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 01:11:40PM -0700, josh@...htriplett.org wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:20:15PM +0200, Johannes Stadlinger wrote:
> > This patch inserts a blank line after a declaration to avoid checkpatch
> > warning.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Stadlinger <Johannes.Stadlinger@....de>
> > Signed-off-by: Maximilian Eschenbacher <maximilian@...henbacher.email>
> > CC: linux-kernel@...cs.fau.de
> > CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > CC: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
> > CC: Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@...il.com>
> > CC: Vitaly Osipov <vitaly.osipov@...il.com>
> > CC: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
> > CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>
> This is one case where I think checkpatch is just wrong; this doesn't
> make the code any more (or less) readable.
>
> Meh-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
We've asked about making checkpatch ignore small blocks but apparently
that is a hard thing. It's less work to apply these than to argue about
them and adding a space doesn't hurt so meh is correct.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists