[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140620202017.GB5558@laptop.dumpdata.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:20:17 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Jungseok Lee <jays.lee@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sungjinn.chung@...sung.com,
"'linux-samsung-soc'" <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: Correct kernel command line handler
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 01:36:29PM +0900, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 01, 2014 9:46 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 10:51:58AM +0900, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> > > This patch corrects kernel command line handler when io_tlb_nslabs is
> > > set to 0.
> > >
> > > A current implementation allocates default size memory (64MB) when
> > > 0 is given to io_tlb_nslabs ("swiotlb=0") by kernel command line.
> > > In other words, memory is allocated unintentionally.
> >
> > What are the other IOMMUs that end up taking over the DMA ops?
>
> I think that no other IOMMUs take over it on ARM64 system, except Xen.
>
> > Or do you end up with no DMA ops?
>
> I focus on ARM64 system which uses swiotlb as default DMA ops.
>
> If some ARM64 platforms would like to use memory only from
> __get_free_pages in swiotlb_alloc_coherent function, an
> interface would be needed to configure reserved memory size.
>
> Thus, I add it to kernel command line handler.
OK. I somehow have lost track of this patch. Is this patch
still valid?
>
> Best Regards
> Jungseok Lee
>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee <jays.lee@...sung.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sungjinn Chung <sungjinn.chung@...sung.com>
> > > ---
> > > lib/swiotlb.c | 8 ++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c index b604b83..9fe9f71
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/lib/swiotlb.c
> > > +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c
> > > @@ -55,6 +55,8 @@
> > >
> > > int swiotlb_force;
> > >
> > > +static int swiotlb_no_use;
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * Used to do a quick range check in swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single and
> > > * swiotlb_tbl_sync_single_*, to see if the memory was in fact
> > > allocated by this @@ -102,6 +104,8 @@ setup_io_tlb_npages(char *str)
> > > io_tlb_nslabs = simple_strtoul(str, &str, 0);
> > > /* avoid tail segment of size < IO_TLB_SEGSIZE */
> > > io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> > > + if (!io_tlb_nslabs)
> > > + swiotlb_no_use = 1;
> > > }
> > > if (*str == ',')
> > > ++str;
> > > @@ -212,7 +216,7 @@ swiotlb_init(int verbose)
> > > unsigned char *vstart;
> > > unsigned long bytes;
> > >
> > > - if (!io_tlb_nslabs) {
> > > + if (!swiotlb_no_use && !io_tlb_nslabs) {
> > > io_tlb_nslabs = (default_size >> IO_TLB_SHIFT);
> > > io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> > > }
> > > @@ -244,7 +248,7 @@ swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size(size_t default_size)
> > > unsigned int order;
> > > int rc = 0;
> > >
> > > - if (!io_tlb_nslabs) {
> > > + if (!swiotlb_no_use && !io_tlb_nslabs) {
> > > io_tlb_nslabs = (default_size >> IO_TLB_SHIFT);
> > > io_tlb_nslabs = ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs, IO_TLB_SEGSIZE);
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 1.7.10.4
> > >
> > >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message
> > to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists