[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140620202100.GG21711@titan.lakedaemon.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:21:00 -0400
From: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: mvebu: rename ARM_ERRATA_753970
Paul,
Working through my back-log...
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:01:11AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> ARM_ERRATA_753970 was renamed to PL310_ERRATA_753970 in v3.2, through
> commit fa0ce4035d48 ("ARM: 7162/1: errata: tidy up Kconfig options for
> PL310 errata workarounds"). Two selects were added in v3.15-rc1 that
> still use the previous name. Rename these.
>
> Make these statements depend on CACHE_PL310, like all other selects of
> PL310_ERRATA_753970. That way it will only be selected if its dependency
> is met.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
> ---
> I reported this before v3.15-rc1. I don't know whether any fixes are
> pending. None are in linux-next.
It looks like rmk just added a patch to fixing the selection of the
erratas. Could you please take a look and either rebase or drop this
patch?
thx,
Jason.
> And ignoring an errata were one
> apparently could be needed sounds, well, scary. Perhaps it is not.
> Anyhow, to make sure this gets fixed, hopefully before v3.15, I'm
> submitting this (untested!) patch.
>
> A related observation. There are three PL310 errata options: one depends
> on CACHE_PL310, three depend on CACHE_L2X0. The one depending on
> CACHE_PL310 is selected only if CACHE_PL310 is set.
>
> But the three depending on CACHE_L2X0 are selected a few times if
> CACHE_L2X0 is set, in other cases if CACHE_PL310 is set, and in some
> cases always. There may be good reasons for this, but it looks odd. I
> know nothing about the PL310 cache and its erratas, so I haven't looked
> into this any further.
>
> arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig
> index 3f73eecbcfb0..501d0f42e7b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ config MACH_ARMADA_370
> config MACH_ARMADA_375
> bool "Marvell Armada 375 boards" if ARCH_MULTI_V7
> select ARM_ERRATA_720789
> - select ARM_ERRATA_753970
> + select PL310_ERRATA_753970 if CACHE_PL310
> select ARM_GIC
> select ARMADA_375_CLK
> select CPU_V7
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ config MACH_ARMADA_375
> config MACH_ARMADA_38X
> bool "Marvell Armada 380/385 boards" if ARCH_MULTI_V7
> select ARM_ERRATA_720789
> - select ARM_ERRATA_753970
> + select PL310_ERRATA_753970 if CACHE_PL310
> select ARM_GIC
> select ARMADA_38X_CLK
> select CPU_V7
> --
> 1.9.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists