linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] /proc/stat vs. failed order-4 allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140621091058.GC3463@osiris>
Date:	Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:10:58 +0200
From:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
	Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Thorsten Diehl <thorsten.diehl@...ibm.com>,
	Andrea Righi <andrea@...terlinux.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] /proc/stat vs. failed order-4 allocation

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:29:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:04:50 +0200 Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > These two patches are supposed to "fix" failed order-4 memory
> > allocations which have been observed when reading /proc/stat.
> > The problem has been observed on s390 as well as on x86.
> > 
> > To address the problem change the seq_file memory allocations to
> > fallback to use vmalloc, so that allocations also work if memory
> > is fragmented.
> > 
> > This approach seems to be simpler and less intrusive than changing
> > /proc/stat to use an interator. Also it "fixes" other users as well,
> > which use seq_file's single_open() interface.
> 
> Yes, those changes look pretty simple and effective.
> 
> I'm unclear on how urgent these fixes are.  I semi-randomly tagged them
> for 3.16 with a -stable backport, but that could be changed?

I assume tagged for 3.16 means you intend to get it merged before 3.16
gets released?
If so, then that would be fine with me.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/