lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140621113653.6b2dd148b35a6ecfb7c08cce@skynet.be>
Date:	Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:36:53 +0200
From:	Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
To:	Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net/dsa/dsa.c: remove null test before kfree

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 10:37:24 +0200
Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 20 June 2014 22:36:47 CEST, Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be> wrote:
> >Fix checkpatch warning:
> >WARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe this check is probably not required
> 
> "probably not" implies that there are cases where the check *is* required.  That means that your commit message should explain why this particular check is redundant.
> 
> I haven't analyzed your changes here, so they could be fine for all I know. My point is that such analysis is your job when submitting cleanups like this one.
> 
> 
> 
AFAIK, any

if(foo)
	kfree(foo)
	
can be updated to kfree(foo) but

if (foo){
	kfree(foo)
	do something else
}

has to be evaluated ; reason for the "probably" in warning message.
If I'm wrong maybe we could be more verbose in checkpatch :)
(I added Joe Perches in Cc list ; maybe he can help here)

Fabian

> Bjørn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ