[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFrcx1n4Txz0a59omx3OKPQQR+AYV2NgNuJ16O01z_7PtGcJpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:12:33 +0200
From: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
To: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix arm64 build error
Hi Mark,
On 25 June 2014 05:16, Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com> wrote:
> I'm seeing the following build error on arm64:
>
> In file included from util/event.c:3:0:
> util/event.h:95:17: error: 'PERF_REGS_MAX' undeclared here (not in a function)
> u64 cache_regs[PERF_REGS_MAX];
> ^
>
> This patch adds a PEFF_REGS_MAX definition for arm64.
s/PEFF_REGS_MAX/PERF_REGS_MAX
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
Thanks!
Note: Do you have any performance figure with and without the caching
code in perf?
Jean
> ---
> tools/perf/arch/arm64/include/perf_regs.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/include/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/include/perf_regs.h
> index e9441b9..1d3f39c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/include/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/include/perf_regs.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
> #include <asm/perf_regs.h>
>
> #define PERF_REGS_MASK ((1ULL << PERF_REG_ARM64_MAX) - 1)
> +#define PERF_REGS_MAX PERF_REG_ARM64_MAX
> +
> #define PERF_REG_IP PERF_REG_ARM64_PC
> #define PERF_REG_SP PERF_REG_ARM64_SP
>
> --
> 1.9.0
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists