linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf: fix arm64 build error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1403705624.755.85.camel@deneb.redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:13:44 -0400
From:	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
To:	Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix arm64 build error

On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 10:12 +0200, Jean Pihet wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> 
> On 25 June 2014 05:16, Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com> wrote:
> > I'm seeing the following build error on arm64:
> >
> >   In file included from util/event.c:3:0:
> >   util/event.h:95:17: error: 'PERF_REGS_MAX' undeclared here (not in a function)
> >     u64 cache_regs[PERF_REGS_MAX];
> >                  ^
> >
> > This patch adds a PEFF_REGS_MAX definition for arm64.
> s/PEFF_REGS_MAX/PERF_REGS_MAX
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Note: Do you have any performance figure with and without the caching
> code in perf?

Sorry, I don't.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/