[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53AB10C0.9050803@collabora.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:11:12 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk>,
Daniel Stone <daniels@...labora.com>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/14] mfd: max77686: Allow the max77686 rtc to wakeup
the system
On 06/25/2014 07:24 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk> wrote:
>> Yes, the original Chrome OS 3.8 max77xxx also called the irq worker thread to
>> ack the interrupt.
>>
>> So the real problem is that an interrupt occurs before the I2C bus controller is
>> resumed and so the interrupt handler is not able to access the registers over I2C.
>>
>> Doug posted the following patches [0,1] that AFAIU solves the issue by making
>> I2C controllers to be resumed in the noirq time to ensure that drivers will be
>> able to use the I2C bus to handler their wakeup.
>
> Yup, that's the solution as far as I know. I know that in ChromeOS we
> still have the extra call to the worker thread (despite the controller
> waking up early), but that might be related to some other problem?
>
> I was able to successfully suspend/resume multiple times once I woke
> the i2c controller up earlier.
>
> If you feel like adding Reviewed-by / Tested-by to my i2c patch then
> feel free! ;)
>
>
Done :)
>> In fact, Doug's original patch had this as a part of the commit message:
>>
>> NOTE: due to wakeup ordering problems this patch alone doesn't work so
>> well on exynos5250-snow. You also need something that brings the i2c
>> bus up before the max77686 wakeup runs.
>>
>> I removed that note since I (probably wrong) thought that he didn't mean it to
>> be part of the commit message but just was side information.
>
> I probably would have left that in the patch, but I'm not objecting to
> you taking it out. :)
>
Yes, I should had left that as well. I'll send a v4 shortly and will include the
note again.
Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists