lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 25 Jun 2014 22:14:16 +0200
From:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Emilio Lopez <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] clk: sunxi: fixes, cleanups and A23 basic clocks

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 05:59:34PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> This is a followup series to my A23 bare-minimum bringup series [1],
> which adds basic clock support for the A23 SoC. It is one of many
> split up from the original A23 series [2]. Yet to come are more
> clocks, reset controllers, pinctrl, prcm, and mmc.
> 
> The first patch fixes the reworked clock protection code merged in
> 3.16-rc1, which unintentionally made clock gates unprotectable.
> 
> The second patch moves the remaining "ahb_sdram" clock to the
> protected clock list, now that it works.
> 
> The third patch adds support for factor clocks that have an N factor
> not starting from 0. This is found on some PLLs in A31/A23.
> 
> The fourth patch adds table-based dividers for div clocks, as some
> clocks, such as apb0 divider on sun4/5/7i, apb1 on sun6/8i and axi
> on sun8i.
> 
> The fifth patch adds support for the basic clocks in the A23, just
> PLL1 for cpus, and the system bus clocks and gates.
> 
> The last patch adds the DT nodes for the newly added clocks.
> 
> Patch 1 should be merged for 3.16, while the rest should go in 3.17.

Why should it go in for 3.16? Is there any user for it yet?

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ