[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140625201603.GA1534@t510.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 16:16:04 -0400
From: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
To: Motohiro Kosaki <Motohiro.Kosaki@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Motohiro Kosaki JP <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: export NR_SHMEM via sysinfo(2) / si_meminfo()
interfaces
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:41:17PM -0700, Motohiro Kosaki wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rafael Aquini [mailto:aquini@...hat.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 2:40 PM
> > To: linux-mm@...ck.org
> > Cc: Andrew Morton; Rik van Riel; Mel Gorman; Johannes Weiner; Motohiro Kosaki JP; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > Subject: [PATCH] mm: export NR_SHMEM via sysinfo(2) / si_meminfo() interfaces
> >
> > This patch leverages the addition of explicit accounting for pages used by shmem/tmpfs -- "4b02108 mm: oom analysis: add shmem
> > vmstat" -- in order to make the users of sysinfo(2) and si_meminfo*() friends aware of that vmstat entry consistently across the
> > interfaces.
>
> Why?
Because we do not report consistently across the interfaces we declare
exporting that data. Check sysinfo(2) manpage, for instance:
[...]
struct sysinfo {
long uptime; /* Seconds since boot */
unsigned long loads[3]; /* 1, 5, and 15 minute load averages */
unsigned long totalram; /* Total usable main memory size */
unsigned long freeram; /* Available memory size */
unsigned long sharedram; /* Amount of shared memory */ <<<<<
[...]
userspace tools resorting to sysinfo() syscall will get a hardcoded 0
for shared memory which is reported differently from /proc/meminfo.
Also, si_meminfo() & si_meminfo_node() are utilized within the kernel to
gather statistics for /proc/meminfo & friends, and so we can leverage collecting
sharedmem from those calls as well, just as we do for totalram, freeram & bufferram.
Regards,
-- Rafael
> Traditionally sysinfo.sharedram was not used for shmem. It was totally strange semantics and completely outdated feature.
> So, we may reuse it for another purpose. But I'm not sure its benefit.
>
> Why don't you use /proc/meminfo?
> I'm afraid userland programs get a confusion.
>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/node.c | 2 +-
> > fs/proc/meminfo.c | 2 +-
> > mm/page_alloc.c | 3 ++-
> > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c index 8f7ed99..c6d3ae0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/node.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/node.c
> > @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static ssize_t node_read_meminfo(struct device *dev,
> > nid, K(node_page_state(nid, NR_FILE_PAGES)),
> > nid, K(node_page_state(nid, NR_FILE_MAPPED)),
> > nid, K(node_page_state(nid, NR_ANON_PAGES)),
> > - nid, K(node_page_state(nid, NR_SHMEM)),
> > + nid, K(i.sharedram),
> > nid, node_page_state(nid, NR_KERNEL_STACK) *
> > THREAD_SIZE / 1024,
> > nid, K(node_page_state(nid, NR_PAGETABLE)), diff --git a/fs/proc/meminfo.c b/fs/proc/meminfo.c index
> > 7445af0..aa1eee0 100644
> > --- a/fs/proc/meminfo.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/meminfo.c
> > @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static int meminfo_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> > K(global_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK)),
> > K(global_page_state(NR_ANON_PAGES)),
> > K(global_page_state(NR_FILE_MAPPED)),
> > - K(global_page_state(NR_SHMEM)),
> > + K(i.sharedram),
> > K(global_page_state(NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE) +
> > global_page_state(NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE)),
> > K(global_page_state(NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE)),
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 20d17f8..f72ea38 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -3040,7 +3040,7 @@ static inline void show_node(struct zone *zone) void si_meminfo(struct sysinfo *val) {
> > val->totalram = totalram_pages;
> > - val->sharedram = 0;
> > + val->sharedram = global_page_state(NR_SHMEM);
> > val->freeram = global_page_state(NR_FREE_PAGES);
> > val->bufferram = nr_blockdev_pages();
> > val->totalhigh = totalhigh_pages;
> > @@ -3060,6 +3060,7 @@ void si_meminfo_node(struct sysinfo *val, int nid)
> > for (zone_type = 0; zone_type < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone_type++)
> > managed_pages += pgdat->node_zones[zone_type].managed_pages;
> > val->totalram = managed_pages;
> > + val->sharedram = node_page_state(nid, NR_SHMEM);
> > val->freeram = node_page_state(nid, NR_FREE_PAGES); #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
> > val->totalhigh = pgdat->node_zones[ZONE_HIGHMEM].managed_pages;
> > --
> > 1.9.3
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists