lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140625163528.11368b86ef7d0a38cf9d1255@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 25 Jun 2014 16:35:28 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Linux-FSDevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm: page_alloc: Reduce cost of dirty zone balancing

On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:58:48 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:

> @@ -325,7 +321,14 @@ static unsigned long zone_dirty_limit(struct zone *zone)
>   */
>  bool zone_dirty_ok(struct zone *zone)
>  {
> -	unsigned long limit = zone_dirty_limit(zone);
> +	unsigned long limit = zone->dirty_limit_cached;
> +	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
> +
> +	if (tsk->flags & PF_LESS_THROTTLE || rt_task(tsk)) {
> +		limit = zone_dirty_limit(zone);
> +		zone->dirty_limit_cached = limit;
> +		limit += limit / 4;
> +	}

Could we get a comment in here explaining what we're doing and why
PF_LESS_THROTTLE and rt_task control whether we do it?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ