linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm: page_alloc: Reduce cost of dirty zone balancing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:43:14 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Linux-FSDevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm: page_alloc: Reduce cost of dirty zone balancing

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 04:35:28PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:58:48 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
> 
> > @@ -325,7 +321,14 @@ static unsigned long zone_dirty_limit(struct zone *zone)
> >   */
> >  bool zone_dirty_ok(struct zone *zone)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned long limit = zone_dirty_limit(zone);
> > +	unsigned long limit = zone->dirty_limit_cached;
> > +	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
> > +
> > +	if (tsk->flags & PF_LESS_THROTTLE || rt_task(tsk)) {
> > +		limit = zone_dirty_limit(zone);
> > +		zone->dirty_limit_cached = limit;
> > +		limit += limit / 4;
> > +	}
> 
> Could we get a comment in here explaining what we're doing and why
> PF_LESS_THROTTLE and rt_task control whether we do it?
> 

        /*
         * The dirty limits are lifted by 1/4 for PF_LESS_THROTTLE (ie. nfsd)
         * and real-time tasks to prioritise their allocations.
         * PF_LESS_THROTTLE tasks may be cleaning memory and rt tasks may be
         * blocking tasks that can clean pages.
         */

That's fairly weak though. It would also seem reasonable to just delete
this check and allow PF_LESS_THROTTLE and rt_tasks to fall into the slow
path if dirty pages are already fairly distributed between zones.
Johannes, any objection to that limit raising logic being deleted?

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/