lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:47:59 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: run hw queue asynchronously in blk_mq_start_hw_queues

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> On 2014-06-24 20:42, Ming Lei wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>  From API view, it isn't good to run all hw queues synchronously
>>> in one context, since it isn't correct for multi hw queue case.
>>>
>>> So this patch adds 'async' parameter to blk_mq_start_hw_queue(),
>>> and make blk_mq_start_hw_queues() to run hw queues asynchronously
>>> at default.
>>
>>
>> BTW, without the change, it is easy to trigger the WARN_ON() in
>> __blk_mq_run_hw_queue().
>
>
> Why not just have it call blk_mq_run_hw_queue()? Pass in async == false, but
> let the cpumask logic sort out if we need to force an async run.

That looks better, thanks.


Thanks,
-- 
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ