linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/13] AT91: PIT: (Almost) remove the global variables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:28:20 +0200
From:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	linux@...im.org.za, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris@...e-electrons.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] AT91: PIT: (Almost) remove the global variables

Hi Boris,

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 07:12:06AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> Hello Maxime,
> 
> On 25/06/2014 15:06, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > The timer driver is using some global variables to define some variables it has
> > to use in most of its functions, like the base address.
> >
> > Use some container_of calls to have a single dynamic (and local) variable to
> > hold this content.
> >
> > The only exception is in the !DT case, where the call chain to
> > at91sam926x_ioremap_pit and then at91sam926x_pit_init as init_time makes it
> > hard for the moment to pass the physical address of the timer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_time.c | 179 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  1 file changed, 108 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_time.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_time.c
> > index 9678ac391a81..f2c463567beb 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_time.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_time.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_address.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> >  
> 
> [...]
> 
> >  	unsigned	bits;
> > @@ -186,67 +195,95 @@ static void __init at91sam926x_pit_common_init(unsigned int pit_irq)
> >  	 * Use our actual MCK to figure out how many MCK/16 ticks per
> >  	 * 1/HZ period (instead of a compile-time constant LATCH).
> >  	 */
> > -	pit_rate = clk_get_rate(mck) / 16;
> > -	pit_cycle = (pit_rate + HZ/2) / HZ;
> > -	WARN_ON(((pit_cycle - 1) & ~AT91_PIT_PIV) != 0);
> > +	pit_rate = clk_get_rate(data->mck) / 16;
> > +	data->cycle = (pit_rate + HZ/2) / HZ;
> 
> You could use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST here.

I usually prefer not to introduce such changes whenever I'm just
renaming a variable, but it's true that this change would be
welcome. I'll do the change in a separate patch.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)