linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/13] AT91: PIT: Move the driver to drivers/clocksource

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140626093006.GB3385@lukather>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:30:06 +0200
From:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	linux@...im.org.za, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris@...e-electrons.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] AT91: PIT: Move the driver to drivers/clocksource

Hi Boris,

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 07:26:54AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> 
> On 25/06/2014 15:06, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Now that we don't depend on anyting in the mach-at91 directory, we can just
> > move the driver to where it belongs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig                                     | 4 ----
> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile                                    | 1 -
> >  drivers/clocksource/Kconfig                                    | 4 ++++
> >  drivers/clocksource/Makefile                                   | 1 +
> >  {arch/arm/mach-at91 => drivers/clocksource}/at91sam926x_time.c | 0
> >  5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >  rename {arch/arm/mach-at91 => drivers/clocksource}/at91sam926x_time.c (100%)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> > index a64412a020d3..b10db0990999 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> > @@ -36,10 +36,6 @@ config AT91_SAM9G45_RESET
> >  	bool
> >  	default !ARCH_AT91X40
> >  
> > -config AT91_SAM9_TIME
> > -	select CLKSRC_OF if OF
> > -	bool
> > -
> >  config HAVE_AT91_SMD
> >  	bool
> >  
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile
> > index 78e9cec282f4..1a916ececbfd 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile
> > @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ obj-		:=
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_OLD_CLK_AT91)	+= clock.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET) += at91sam9_alt_reset.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_AT91_SAM9G45_RESET) += at91sam9g45_reset.o
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_AT91_SAM9_TIME)	+= at91sam926x_time.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_AT91SAM9)	+= sam9_smc.o
> >  
> >  # CPU-specific support
> > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> > index 065131cbfcc0..cd8b73ddbef3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> > @@ -118,6 +118,10 @@ config CLKSRC_ARM_GLOBAL_TIMER_SCHED_CLOCK
> >  	help
> >  	 Use ARM global timer clock source as sched_clock
> >  
> > +config AT91_SAM9_TIME
> > +	select CLKSRC_OF if OF
> > +	bool
> > +
> >  config CLKSRC_METAG_GENERIC
> >  	def_bool y if METAG
> >  	help
> > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Makefile b/drivers/clocksource/Makefile
> > index 800b1303c236..3088928070f8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clocksource/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Makefile
> > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_CLKSRC_OF)	+= clksrc-of.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_ATMEL_TCB_CLKSRC)	+= tcb_clksrc.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_AT91_SAM9_TIME)	+= at91sam926x_time.o
> 
> I would rename both Kconfig and source file name into ATMEL_PIT and
> atmel_pit.c (or AT91_PIT and atmel_pit.c) to cleary show that this
> driver add support for the PIT block.

I actually had the same idea, but older AT91 SoCs (rm9200, for
example) also mention the PIT, even though the IP is different.

Since AT91_PIT was just too generic and only added confusion, I left
it as is, but maybe we can find a better name.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)