linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] block: virtio-blk: support multi vq per virtio-blk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACVXFVMHPdEzai32jRmLt7qGMFcUqFb8OunF0tzySpKoLWWiwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jun 2014 20:04:41 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] block: virtio-blk: support multi vq per virtio-blk

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one
> virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's
> hardware queue.
>
> With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk
> device can get improved.
>
> For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over
> qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification
> from each vq and processing host I/O are still kept in the per-device
> iothread context, the change is based on qemu v2.0.0 release, and
> can be accessed from below tree:
>
>         git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ming/qemu.git #v2.0.0-virtblk-mq.1
>
> For enabling the multi-vq feature, 'num_queues=N' need to be added into
> '-device virtio-blk-pci ...' of qemu command line, and suggest to pass
> 'vectors=N+1' to keep one MSI irq vector per each vq, and the feature
> depends on x-data-plane.
>
> Fio(libaio, randread, iodepth=64, bs=4K, jobs=N) is run inside VM to
> verify the improvement.
>
> I just create a small quadcore VM and run fio inside the VM, and
> num_queues of the virtio-blk device is set as 2, but looks the
> improvement is still obvious. The host is 2 sockets, 8cores(16threads)
> server.
>
> 1), about scalability
> - jobs = 2, thoughput: +33%
> - jobs = 4, thoughput: +100%
>
> 2), about top thoughput: +39%
>
> So in my test, even for a quad-core VM, if the virtqueue number
> is increased from 1 to 2, both scalability and performance can
> get improved a lot.
>
> In above qemu implementation of virtio-blk-mq device, only one
> IOthread handles requests from all vqs, and the above throughput
> data has been very close to same fio test in host side with single
> job. So more improvement should be observed once more IOthreads are
> used for handling requests from multi vqs.
>
> TODO:
>         - adjust vq's irq smp_affinity according to blk-mq hw queue's cpumask
>
> V3:
>         - fix use-after-free on vq->name reported by Michael
>
> V2: (suggestions from Michael and Dave Chinner)
>         - allocate virtqueues' pointers dynamically
>         - make sure the per-queue spinlock isn't kept in same cache line
>         - make each queue's name different
>
> V1:
>         - remove RFC since no one objects
>         - add '__u8 unused' for pending as suggested by Rusty
>         - use virtio_cread_feature() directly, suggested by Rusty

Sorry, please add Jens' reviewed-by.

    Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>

Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/