[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJKoSVStb88Y-6r0bTG7bgXjRCujd-p9wM09L3_s-Nvsk4GLgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:51:44 +0800
From: Cheng-Wei Lee <lee.rhapsody@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sherif Shehab Aldin <shehabaldin.sherif@...il.com>,
Avinash Kumar <avi.kp.137@...il.com>,
Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>,
devel <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: wlan-ng/hfa384x_usb.c: remove return
statements for void function
Hi Joe,
Thanks for your kindly reply.
I'll submit patch again.
Many thanks,
Quentin
2014-06-26 8:09 GMT+08:00, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>:
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 23:35 +0800, Cheng-Wei Lee wrote:
>> This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl issues in hfa384x_usb.c:
>> WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
>
> Still has a mismatch between subject and code
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x_usb.c
> []
>> @@ -3533,7 +3533,7 @@ static void hfa384x_usbin_rx(wlandevice_t
>> *wlandev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> }
>>
>> done:
>> - return;
>> + pr_debug("hfa384x_usbin_rx: done\n");
>
> I suggest you just leave the return,
>
> Any checkpatch suggestion this was needed was a false
> positive that should be resolved by this patch:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1728891
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists