[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53B1541E.4080008@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:12:14 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>, Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...technion.ac.il>
CC: gleb@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix lapic.c debug prints
Il 30/06/2014 03:03, Nadav Amit ha scritto:
>>>
>>> sipi_vector = apic->sipi_vector;
>>> - pr_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
>>> + apic_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
>>
>> Why don't we just use pr_debug all throughout ?
>>
> I don't know. I just tried to make it consistent, since it really bugged
> me while I was debugging the local-apic.
> If you prefer the other way around (which does seem to be better), I can
> do the search-and-replace.
vcpu number probably could be moved inside apic_debug, at which point
apic_debug becomes preferrable.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists